Reviving a QIC tape backup solution from 30 years ago

When re-living ones’ childhood, most would listen to some old music, or play a classic board game. The writer of this blog re-enjoys a quarter-inch-cartridge tape drive. 

Recently I mentioned my LTO tape backup solution, a modern type of tape backup which promises minimum 30 years of storage. In the context of anything IT related this feels like quite a bold claim.

I though it would be interesting to dig up a tape backup solution from 30 years ago. There is one type of tape from that era that is of particular personal significance to me:

3M DC6525 Tape

Pictured is a 3M DC6525 (525MB) QIC (Quarter Inch Cartridge) tape – which is the exact type of tape that was used to backup data from our family computer when I was a child.

Disclaimer: A cornucopia of different tapes where also used in our household including DC6250, DC6150, DC600A, and even some mini-QIC tapes (DC2120, DC2000) – just for good measure.

The QIC form factor enjoyed a huge lifespan – with the earliest 2.9MB (DC300A) tapes appearing in 1972, right through to the final 20GB (SLR50) type released 25 years later in 1997. Even today we’re practically up to our knees in QIC tapes and drives, the world over. All of the stuff I show here remains cheap and plentiful!

While our tapes are unlikely to ever be seen again, if we could reach into the past and grab that tape briefcase, what kind of prospects would we have of recovering that data?

That unfortunately is the one test I cannot easily do, because I don’t have any period-written tapes test, and I’m not entirely comfortable about buying other peoples’ tapes off eBay. Besides, the laws of physics tell us that we don’t need to test this. If the tape is intact (not so likely in the case of cheap “no brand” tapes of the day), the data will be there.

More likely, it’s everything else that’s going to get in our way – software, tape drive hardware, interfaces, drivers, etc. Let’s hit up eBay for a pile of old tape junk, and see what kind of difficulties we run into.

Tape drive

The drive I’ve selected is a Wangtek 51000HT – it has an old school charm about it, sharing the same primitive mechanical design from their earlier drives. Wangtek were a big player in early QIC type drives but went bankrupt in 1995. This particular drives features an easy-to-use SCSI interface and reads and writes 250MB, 525MB and 1.2GB tapes.

There was a later 52000HT model also supporting 2.4GB tapes, as well as the earlier 5525ES model supporting only 250 and 525MB tapes, Most of those have some pretty major rework (image) on the main PCB – making them quite fragile.

Intriguingly the schematic as well as a very detailed service manual for these drives is available. Here is a page from it.

Earlier drives (i.e. 5150, 5125, 5099) had an obscure “QIC” interface which required a special ISA interface card. “Formatter” cards were available, which were attached to the underside of the drive, translating the oddball QIC interface to SCSI. On my drive the formatter is crammed onto the same PCB as the basic drive control circuitry.

Capstan troubles

The issue we’re very likely going to hit with these drives is the rubber-like material on the capstan, a rubber Tyre on a brass wheel which drives the tape backwards and forward. Unfortunately – after several decades it breaks down and turns to goop.

I was already aware that capstan restoration is a big subject in vintage computing so was expecting difficulties – but initially thought I’d be right because my capstan looked intact. I put a tape in the drive, it spun back and forward OK but eventually seized up. I pulled the tape out to discover this:

A bit of stray blue-tack in the drive? Nope. That would be the remains of my capstan

So far as I know there are no ready-made capstan replacements so I dedicated some time to come up with a replacement. More about that here.

Potential tape troubles

Another commonly mentioned problem is the elastic drive belt inside the tape. Tension of belts in early tapes (i.e. DC600A and prior) is likely to be less than exciting today but apparently belts in newer tapes (DC6150 and onwards) last significantly better.

The tape material is also an issue in these older 1980s tapes – most have now broken down and are likely to jam and leave a sticky mess on the head, and on the metal pillars inside the tape. Suffice to say that the prospect of recovering data from these older tapes is at best marginal.

As of 2020 – 1990s tapes and newer (DC6150 and onwards) still work pretty well.


As previously mentioned, my selected drive is SCSI – making attachment to a PC pretty easy. I tried to attached it to a modern Adaptec PCIe adapter which did detect that something was at the selected ID, but wasn’t able to communicate with it, so unfortunately wouldn’t be booting a Windows 10 PC with this drive attached.

I’ll be attaching my using an Adaptec SlimSCSI PCMCIA – inserted into an IBM Thinkpad 760XL from the 1990s

Operating system drivers

The operating system running on my test PC is Windows NT 4.0. NT4 it turns out, has pretty good built-in support for tape drives of the time.

I’m fully aware that Linux also supports these drives, and likely still does to this day however Linux didn’t exist, or wasn’t commonly used during the era of these drives, so I won’t be looking at this for this article.

The most likely operating system used with these drives was DOS, along with the popular Sytos suite, but I don’t have a period desktop PC handy, and using an Adaptec APA-1460 PCMCIA on DOS is a hassle I have previously spent hours tearing my hair out over. I cannot be bothered with it at this time.

The driver to use with my drive is “Wangtek 525, 250, or 9500 tape drive” (wangqic.sys). Easy? Apparently not.

Upon rebooting NT – we’ve got an error in the event log:

for f–ks sake. It’s the correct driver for the drive, what the heck is the problem?

Fortunately the source code for the driver is out there, both in the leaked snapshot of NT4.0 and in the NT4 DDK. This will make getting to the bottom of this a heck of a lot easier.

Within seconds there’s a hint as to what might be wrong – the driver is performing a SCSI INQUIRY command on the drive, then doing a text comparison of the result against its own list of supported drives. I wrote a small test program to check what the drive was sending:


Port 1, ID 3:

Vendor string: "UNISYS  "
Device string: "QIC1000    "


It turns out my drive has bastardised Unisys firmware on it, which would explain why the NT driver doesn’t like it. This is likely because it was sold as a Unisys qualified and supplied part, and whatever operating system that machine was running only worked with drives which responded like the above, so if you were adding or replacing a tape drive on that machine, it was important to ensure you were paying the appropriate price for it.

It’s pretty unlikely that anything other than the device ID was changed – having a custom firmware image which deviated from the relevant QIC standards would have created a lot of unnecessary hassle and expense for Unisys.

A quick solution to this problem is to just hack wangqic.sys to expect the above device string, but this is only half a solution because any backup software I point at it is also going to spit the dummy, requiring yet more software hacking. Let’s deal with this properly…

The device ID is coming from the firmware running on the Z80 CPU, which is loaded from a socketed EPROM. There is also an Intel 8031 on the same PCB with its own socketed EPROM.

The offending incorrect device ID is found in seconds, and replaced with what it is supposed to be. The chip this firmware is stored on unfortunately is an OTP EPROM (AT27C512) – I had to buy another to make this modification.

After flashing the new EPROM, it’s back in the drive, now let’s see what we get:


Port 1, ID 3:

Vendor string: "WANGTEK "
Device string: "51000HTSCSI "


Looks better – the NT driver is happy too:

Now I’m back to a retail 51000HT, with a makeshift capstan – let’s try use this thing.

Backup software

If I was just wanting to play around with the drive its self, NTBackup (Supplied with NT 4.0) is a pretty respectable way to write/read files to/from tape.

A trip down the memory lane of backup solutions wouldn’t be complete without some proper backup software – specifically I’ll be using Backup Exec. A very popular suite which started as a small relatively simple DOS program, eventually evolving into a comprehensive enterprise backup solution. It remains very popular to this day.

As I previously mentioned – Sytos was more popular for use with QIC tape drives back in the day, however I am not in a position to fire that up at present.

Getting my hands on an old copy of Backup Exec turned out to be another unexpected difficulty. I was looking specifically for version 8.6 which was one of the last to support my drive, and it also runs on NT 4.0. It’s actually much newer – from circa 20 years ago, so I won’t be covering it in any detail. It has no problems reading tapes created by earlier versions of its self, so no need to go back any further.

Downloading it turned out to be impossible, so in the end I had to hit up eBay for a tatty retail boxed copy (it cost next to nothing) but even then I still had a problem. I was jipped by the seller – It’s upgrade version, so I needed a license key from a previous version to install it. Has he got one? Of course not. FFS.

The day was saved by a cheeky utility from that same era – Microsoft ScriptIt – a UI automation tool. In minutes I whipped up a small script which sits there entering randomly generated license keys into the installer. After 15 minutes at a rate of 4 attempts per second: Bingo. We’ve got a “full” key for version 8.6. Most primitive keygen ever!

We’re in business. A few clicks later and Backup Exec is writing some data this ancient tape drive. Initially I found the OS kept locking up during operations – suspecting the revision ‘A’ Adaptec SlimSCSI I was using, I cast it aside and plugged in a revision ‘D’ card (I’ve got a few). That seems to have fixed the problem.

Eventually I got a successful run of a ~180MB data set which took about 15 minutes to write, and another 15 minutes to verify.

The takeaway?

Reviving ancient backup sets is no problem at all, provided that all of the tapes, hardware to read them, cables, interface cards, software and software license keys are all available to whoever might be trying to read back those tapes several decades from now.

Someone restoring a QIC-525 backup set might want to look at a Tandberg drive – assuming they don’t want to grapple with the “capstan” problem.

Final note

Despite my initial disinterest in this subject – I’m really impressed with the engineering of all of the products I’ve looked at here. If we overlook the dodgy capstan, that Wangtek tape drive is a nicely designed product which still works perfectly even three decades later. The tapes I’ve used area also “period” – once again, working perfectly. I’ve had no mechanical problems, errors or anything!

It is unfortunate that older versions of Backup Exec are so hard to come by, because this means no-one much really cares about them. It was good to give this forgotten release another day in the sun.

15 thoughts on “Reviving a QIC tape backup solution from 30 years ago

  1. Hi, having read your web pages it seems that you have experienced the same problem as i , with scsi tape drives.
    I have both a wangtek 525es and an Archive 2525s scsi drives which I used on my Amiga computers back in the 1990`s.
    Now having come to re use these tape drives, the capstan rubber drive on both tape machines turned to gloop.
    I note that you have machined the replacement for these capstans, by any chance do you sell these items?
    If so i would consider the purchase of these bands for both tape drives.

    1. It wasn’t my plan to go into business selling them that’s for sure. In perhaps 2-3 months from now I should be in a position to make some more however. Drop me an email.

      1. Hello,

        Do you have some spare Rollers left? I want to fix my Wangtec Drive too. That would be fantastic.


    2. I’m also interested in a replacement capstan rubber for a an Apple SC40 Tape drive (uses the same QIC style tape as in your post here). Are you in a position to create any more of these?

  2. Hi Matthew,
    I have Windows 95, and XP on a desktop and I want to use it to install the tape driver WangTek 51000HT. I need a SCSI board probably too. The driver I just bought a few days ago, and I want to have the content of the tape copied to a DVD if possible. I see you did a lot of work on this subject. Is it possible to get Tape to DVD copy?

    Thank you,

  3. I just tried to read a tape on an ancient Archive 2150S, only to have the tape stick to the goopy capstan and wrap around it. I ran across your interesting article while looking for QIC drives. I think I might try to wrap some vinyl tape around the capstan.

  4. I have successfully made capstan rollers for QIC drives using a 3D printer and innoflex material. Easy solution ! If only a good source for the drivebelts were available…

      1. I came across this post as I was googling around about DC6150 tapes. I have 2 of them, source code backups from when I was an ISV/VAR in the early 90s. They have been in my fireproof safe for about 3 decades.

        I wonder if you know anyone who’d be willing to see if they could read the contents (they’re Unix tar format tapes) to see if they could be remastered into a DVD-R or something.

        1. I’m sure they are probably still good! It’s finding a restored drive, software, and hardware interface. I have several machines with D600A’s (60) MB on an old Xenix system that I use. They work great after recapping, cleaning, relubricating, and having Terry’s Rubber Rollers rebuild the capstans. You could run into trouble with the belt inside the tape.. it stretches over time. I’ve had improperly stored tapes with mold on them. But yours sound like they are readable. Maybe reach out to and contact AL. You might be able to send them to him and he might be able to read them.

  5. Dump your copy of backup exec up to the internet archive. It’s abandonware at this point and it may help someone else. If Seagate (current copyright holder) cares, they’ll issue a takedown, but they probably won’t.

    1. Good idea actually. I thought about it but didn’t think anyone would actually want it, because they did, it would have already been done 😉

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *